Protecting Business Assets in a NH Divorce
4.9 rating from 1000+ reviews
Owning a business before or during a marriage doesn’t automatically protect it from being divided in a divorce. New Hampshire courts take a broad view of what constitutes marital property, and a business can easily fall within that category depending on when it was established, how it was operated, and whether marital funds or labor contributed to its value. Understanding the framework early is the most practical thing a business owner going through a divorce can do.
How New Hampshire Treats Marital Property
New Hampshire follows an equitable distribution standard. Under RSA 458:16-a, marital property is divided in a manner the court finds fair, which doesn’t necessarily mean equal. All property owned by either spouse is presumed to be marital property unless there’s a compelling reason to treat it otherwise.
A business started during the marriage is almost always marital property. A business started before the marriage may be treated as separate property, but if marital funds were invested in it, or if a spouse contributed significant labor to its growth, courts may find that the marital estate has an interest in it anyway.
Valuing a Business in Divorce Proceedings
Before any division happens, the business must be valued. This is rarely a straightforward calculation. Common valuation methods include:
- Asset-based valuation: What the business owns minus what it owes
- Income-based valuation: What the business earns, often using a capitalization of earnings or discounted cash flow approach
- Market-based valuation: Comparing the business to similar businesses that have sold
Spouses often commission competing valuations, and the difference between them can be significant. The methodology used, and the assumptions built into it, matters enormously to the final number.
Options for Handling Business Division
When a business is identified as marital property, there are a few common ways the situation resolves:
One spouse buys out the other’s interest using cash, retirement assets, real estate equity, or other marital property as the offset. In some cases, particularly when both spouses have active roles, the business continues to be co-owned post-divorce, though this arrangement requires very clear legal structure to function. In cases where neither party can afford a buyout and co-ownership is unworkable, a forced sale becomes the option of last resort.
A Concord divorce lawyer can work through which of these paths is realistic given your business’s value, your marital estate, and what the other spouse is likely to pursue.
What Business Owners Should Document
Before and during the divorce process, documentation makes a real difference:
- Records of any premarital investment in the business
- Separate accounts that kept business and personal finances distinct
- Documentation of whether the other spouse had any operational role
- Prenuptial or postnuptial agreements that addressed business ownership
Becker Legal handles complex divorce matters in New Hampshire, including cases where business valuation and division are at the center of the dispute. If you own a business and are facing divorce, speaking with a Concord divorce lawyer about how to approach the valuation and division process is a practical first step.
Schedule a Consultation
Contact Us
Practice Areas
Client Testimonials
Posted on Google
Elizabeth BTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Efficient and effective. Has been a pleasure to work with.Posted on Google
Oakley LTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Attorney Becker was a pleasure to work with. He was professional and attentive throughout the entire process. My case was handled swiftly and we received the desired outcome as a result of his intelligence and commitment. Highly recommend!Posted on Google
Dana STrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Leif Becker is a WINNER I got myself in a tough situation and he was able to make things work in favor of me I’m from Arkansas and didn’t know who to turn to I made a lucky choice of retaining him as my lawyer and it was the right choice luckily, definitely put your trust in this lawyer 1 million in a millionPosted on Google
Serena RTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was very impressed with how they handled my case. They were always responsive, kept me well-informed, and explained everything in a clear and concise manner. I felt confident in their abilities and trusted their guidance throughout the process!Posted on Google
Andrew LTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I cannot recommend attorney Leif Becker highly enough. He has represented me in multiple cases involving false accusations, and his expertise and brilliance in the courtroom have been nothing short of extraordinary. His deep knowledge of the law, combined with his ability to present facts clearly and persuasively, has been pivotal in achieving favorable outcomes in every case. Mr. Becker approaches each case with professionalism, dedication, and a genuine passion for justice. He is not only an excellent attorney but also a source of reassurance during challenging times. Whether you’re dealing with false accusations, child custody matters, or other legal challenges, I highly suggest reaching out to him. If you’re looking for someone who will fight tirelessly for you and navigate the legal system with precision, Leif Becker is the attorney you want in your corner.Posted on Google
Jessica RTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Leif exhibited the perfect combination of professionalism and altruism. Not only did he handle my legal affairs in a prompt, attentive and efficient matter, but it is apparent that he truly cares about the welfare of his clients. Highly recommend and would work with again.